THE MOON AND THE TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION
CASA LOMA/RUSSELL HILL SUBWAY ACCIDENT AUGUST 11th 1995
INQUEST DAY THREE -
Wed 10 January 1996
A SIGNAL SYSTEM
EXPLANATION
Today started the examination in
detail of the signal system. The Crown had obtained a TTC training video which
was played twice. Not because, as in the previous two days, the only monitor in
the courtroom was faced first to the jury and a tape played and then faced to
the counsel bench and the tape played again. This time it was replayed because
it was so confusing a second playing was required to try to understand it. See
the comment section below. Today the jury was seated in front of the counsel
bench and the video played for jury, counsel and public gallery all at once.
After the video, Mr. Mark Reidak,
Head of the Signal Maintainers, took the stand. After the cool, calm
presentation of SS Staples (Sgt. Buchanan was on the stand for such a short
time, if you blinked, you missed him!!), Mr. Reidak presented a very different
aspect. First of all, he was chewing gum throughout the rest of the day which
was most unprofessional. Secondly he does not seem to have an appreciation of
the seriousness of the situation in which he finds himself. He was guided by
Mr. Punter to describe the detailed mechanics of the signal system and the
signals between St. Clair West and Dupont in particular. If I thought SS
Staples was volunteering information, his performance looked like silent
rectitude against Mr. Reidak who even got into bantering matches with counsel!!
As other TTC witnesses were present in court, it was obvious that it was
expected that Mr. Reidak would be finished by around lunchtime. He was still on
the stand at today's adjournment and Brain Leck (TTC counsel) has only
scratched the surface with him.
Mr. Reidak has 64 employees under him
and has only recently borne the mantel of head of the Signal Maintainers. Mr.
Punter elicited the information that he got the promotion very shortly after
the accident (11 Aug. 1995) and that he got it because he was able to describe
the signal system to senior management in a manner they understood. Senior
Management's understanding capabilities are, in my humble opinion, somewhat
suspect!!!
Mr. Reidak offered the following
facts:-
Wismer & Becker designed and
installed the Spadina Signal System at a contracted cost of approx. $7 million.
This was $3 million dollars below the General Railway Signal company and the
Union Switch and Signal company's approx. $10 million bid each. Mr. Reidak
estimates it has cost the Commission at least twice this difference in the
interim to fix, improve, adjust, modify, alter and otherwise change the
equipment provided. Mr. Reidak
is the first employee to testify and the first to mention trying to achieve his
objectives through budgetary cutbacks. The Intermediate Point Headway Control
system was briefly described. Mr. Punter established the poor communications
between TCC and the staff at track level. Described how the Erickson train
stops have been modified. There are 229 Erickson train stops which Mr. Punter
described as junk and Mr. Reidak agreed.
Criticized the training tape we had seen as being confusing.
After lunch, Mr. Reidak was
questioned by the counsel for the Parties in Standing. Mr. Falzone thinks it is
common knowledge that there are at least two train stops in the danger position
at every red light. Mr. Reidak opined that this was the case in only
approximately one third of our signals (both interlocking and automatic).
Mr. Falzone (Mr. Jeffries and Local
113's counsel) is also quite ignorant of the signal system and is completely
unaware of the meaning of a Red signal with a Lunar White underneath it. This
is because, as yet, no evidence has been presented that the Lunar White is driven
by the same circuit as a normal Yellow aspect. Mr. Reidak did not clarify.
Mr. Leck lead Mr. Reidak through a
series of questions to establish the safety and reliability of the signal
system; a course he will continue tomorrow.
1) When the training video was played I was not in a position to
see the video but only to hear the audio. The audio sounded adequate and
explained the Signals and Wayside Signs in a manner that seemed to me to be appropriate.
At the end of the video the commentator said that, to the accompaniment of
jazzy background music, "You are now familiar with the Signals and Signs
in the Subway." Everyone in the court room laughed derisively at this and
I couldn't understand why. When the jury requested to see the video again I
decided to watch the video also. It is a video of such poor quality I am amazed
that anyone at the TTC would let it out, let alone use it for training. The
picture is not a video; it is a collection of very poorly taken and presented
colour slides. There is not too much correlation between the audio and video
and the whole is extremely confusing. No wonder there was derision in the
laughter. When will we learn???
2) Another day has gone by without a clear
description of what the Signal System is about for the Jury's benefit. Falzone
reiterated his confusion between the Signal description lighting and a Lunar
White and again he demonstrated his ignorance of the system. I think if he is
going to represent Local 113, the least he can do is to "get his feet
wet". He is not doing his client a service.
3) I suppose that the court personnel,
coroner, police, counsel etc. are somewhat inured to the fact that they are
dealing with death and this seems to be rubbing off on the witnesses. There is
obviously a cozy relationship between ALL the parties concerned and no doubt
with out this they would all go mad. But there appears to me to be a lack of
decorum that I associate with the judicial process. As the numbers of attendees
drop off and the inquest drags on this deterioration in respect is likely to
increase. Pity !!!!
Day 4 Commences at 9:30 a.m.
tomorrow.
Dave Irwin
- 10 Jan 1996
E-mail
Return to Home Page