THE MOON AND THE TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION
CASA LOMA/RUSSELL HILL SUBWAY ACCIDENT AUGUST 11th 1995
INQUEST DAY SIXTEEN
- Thursday February 1st 1996
BOMBS FALLING
EVERYWHERE
After the excitement of yesterday,
there was an in-camera session which started at 9:30 a.m. which was interrupted
around 10:45 when Mr. Punter made the announcement to the public that the
Inquest would reconvene in the afternoon.
Mr. John LaForce of Philadelphia was
on the stand for cross examination by the remaining counsel. Mr. LaForce was
asked to comment on Mr. Cedarburg's report and felt there was no connection to
the accident. He revealed that his appearance in Toronto was as a direct result
of his knowing Mr. Gunn. He wanted the record to show that Mr. Gunn had been
responsible for the creation of the Transit Police in Philadelphia.
Mr. LaForce did not offer any new
evidence today. Despite attempts by counsel, he would not comment on the
"bomb" dropped by Mr. Punter yesterday. The bomb is a document produced
by two TTC employees Moe Blakey and Al Robinson called the Subway Improvement
Project. From what was revealed of the report, it sounded like something I
wrote!! Counsel used Mr. LaForce as an excuse to get as much of the report into
the record as they could by getting him to comment. Mr. LaForce however would
not be drawn in as he had no knowledge of the areas covered in the report.
As the day's session was about to
close, Mr. David Hammond, General Counsel of the TTC, appeared in court and
handed Mr. Leck a large blue binder which Mr. Leck then held up in a triumphant
fashion declaring that he had his own bomb. Dr. Huxter asked if it could be
called a reverse bomb!!. This "bomb" was evidence that the police had
been handed a copy of the Subway Improvement Project report at least a month
ago and any accusations that the TTC was obstructing the investigation are
groundless. Mr. Punter and the Punter Youth were thrown into a complete state
of disarray as a result of this revelation.
1) The Subway Improvement Project was
copied and left "lying around" such that even I, who has tried not to
see anything unless it has been properly entered into evidence in order to
maintain an aloof position, was able to peruse. Large portions of this document
have been entered into evidence as described. Some of which is more than
disturbing. For example, it appears that there are 13 minutes running time
allowed between Wilson and St. Clair West and yet this piece can be done in 8
minutes without too much effort. It is my experience in the years I have been
associated with the subway that Local 113 has tried valiantly to have the round
trip time on both lines increased to a point where we are not offering a
service any longer. The delays experienced by passengers as we hang around
waiting for things like the Intermediate Point Headway Control system to click
over have been commented on and complained about by the public but have been
brushed off. Evidence from this report
of this sort (5 extra minutes on an 8 minute run time) is all the evidence most
people will require to indicate our management of the subway is in serious
trouble. The report is replete with problems associated with many aspects of
the Subway operation and the way in which we treat our employees who operate in
the subway. As this evidence is properly entered and discussed, which it will
be next week when the authors are called to the stand, these notes will reflect
the revelations. Stay tuned - it's going to be fun !!!!!!!!
2) One damning accusation which will come
back to haunt TTC management is that there is a paper trail of recommendations
that have been made over the years (by staff and consultants) of which few, if
any, have ever been implemented.
3) Mr. Leck has been forced into a position
of being an apologist for do nothing management where "further study"
has become a TTC euphemism for doing something to correct a problem.
Day 17 commences at 9:30 a.m.
tomorrow.
Dave Irwin - 1
February 1996
E-mail
Return to Home Page